![dell precision 490 review dell precision 490 review](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/reviews/03zpmk4l53xzsKnxFhooW7X-1..v1609356721.jpg)
I used the Sandra XII benchmark suite from SiSoftware to measure component performance.
![dell precision 490 review dell precision 490 review](https://i.dell.com/images/global/products/precn/sp_90_harddrives.jpg)
This approach gives excellent quantitative insight, while allowing you to reproduce our tests on your systems. I decided to rely solely on high-quality benchmarks available at no cost to readers. The benchmarks The benchmarks I used in this evaluation represent a departure from the metrics InfoWorld has traditionally used. Curiously, the high and low ends appear to represent the best values, while the midrange serves as a refuge for those who don't want to spend for the high-end Dell, and whose needs are not met by the entry-level HP. We also examined a value-oriented system from HP and a very high-end workstation from Dell. As we'll see shortly, the magic looked a lot alike.
#Dell precision 490 review windows
We asked them each for a midrange system costing $5,000 retail, and we required they use identical processors, the same amount of RAM, and the same releases of Windows XP so that we could compare what other magic they could add to this base and still stay at $5,000. Meanwhile, this lab review focuses on major players HP and Dell, who together own the lion's share of the market. We expect to review machines from both vendors in the next few months.
![dell precision 490 review dell precision 490 review](https://www.server-config.ro/6690-thickbox_default/workstation-dell-precision-t3430-sff-intel-core-i5-8400-280-ghz-16gb-ddr4-512gb-ssd-amd-radeon-pro-wx-3100-garantie-3-ani.jpg)
And Lenovo, which is just starting up its workstation line of business, could not respond with the configuration we wanted within our time frame. Sun was in a prolonged holding pattern waiting for AMD to ship quad-core Opterons (Barcelona). Only Dell and HP could provide such systems. To get a good cross-section of the market, we contacted the four principal vendors of x86 workstations, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Sun, and requested dual-processor, quad-core machines as a midrange baseline. On the other, workstations today deliver unimaginably more power than a decade ago at undreamed of prices. On the one hand, this evolution has led to a market that is homogeneous in its product delivery and devoid of the intense competition of days of yore. SGI abandoned workstations, IBM's workstation division has morphed into Lenovo, and Sun - a once-dominant player - occupies a minor niche. The number of vendors has also shrunk dramatically. Today, the RISC processors that characterized the Sun, SGI, IBM, and HP machines are mostly memories, and all leading workstations are built on x86 processors. A decade later, the market segment is significantly different. An added element to this competition was the vendors' reliance on vastly different processor architectures to deliver the knockout performance. In those days, some 10 years ago, companies such as Sun Microsystems, SGI, IBM, HP, and Dell competed fiercely to deliver the top desktop systems characterized by powerful graphics and processing engines. There was a time when workstations occupied a highly competitive niche in the hardware market.